Cumberland BC: The Cumberlander Articles Section
Global · 2nd August 2009
Teresa Wild
I am very concerned that the flu vaccine being "offered" to the world's citizens is unsafe.
Authorities have recently confirmed that these shots contain mercury and other ingredients lethal to our neurons, causing early Alzheimer's, autism and immunodefficiency.
Because of the hype by the World Health Organization that the H1N1 WILL get worse, production of millions of doses has been rushed to mandatorily inject the world's human population. Proper tests have not been done to determine side effects. Health Canada is saying they will "closely monitor" those who receive the shots first. This means these people are the experimental monkeys!
And all this risk they are "asking" us to take is to avoid this terrible flu pandemic which is a milder flu than the usual seasonal ones. "There is something rotten in the state of Denmark..." There is a stink of corruption in the pharmaceutical industry: giant profits, sanctioned by OUR governments!
Everyone needs to inform themselves on what is in the needles, and why. If we decide to decline the shots, we may need to fight for that right. I include here a copy of the Nuremberg Code, which states clearly that it is illegal to perform potentially harmful experiments on anyone without consent. They figured this out in 1947, so we would never be victims of a totalitarian regime again.
THE NUREMBERG CODE
1) The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
a) This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
b) The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2) The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3) The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4) The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5) No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6) The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7) Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8) The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9) During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
10) During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
____________________
Image courtesy David Dees
Authorities have recently confirmed that these shots contain mercury and other ingredients lethal to our neurons, causing early Alzheimer's, autism and immunodefficiency.
Because of the hype by the World Health Organization that the H1N1 WILL get worse, production of millions of doses has been rushed to mandatorily inject the world's human population. Proper tests have not been done to determine side effects. Health Canada is saying they will "closely monitor" those who receive the shots first. This means these people are the experimental monkeys!
And all this risk they are "asking" us to take is to avoid this terrible flu pandemic which is a milder flu than the usual seasonal ones. "There is something rotten in the state of Denmark..." There is a stink of corruption in the pharmaceutical industry: giant profits, sanctioned by OUR governments!
Everyone needs to inform themselves on what is in the needles, and why. If we decide to decline the shots, we may need to fight for that right. I include here a copy of the Nuremberg Code, which states clearly that it is illegal to perform potentially harmful experiments on anyone without consent. They figured this out in 1947, so we would never be victims of a totalitarian regime again.
THE NUREMBERG CODE
1) The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
a) This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
b) The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2) The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3) The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4) The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5) No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6) The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7) Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8) The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9) During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
10) During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
____________________
Image courtesy David Dees
(THE_NUREMBERG_CODE.doc)